The new edition will carry this listing: "wedgie: noun. a prank in which the victim's undershorts are jerked upward so as to become wedged between the buttocks."
All I can say is, what took so long?
Other additions include "Al Qaeda," "blog," "cargo pants," "irritable bowel syndrome" and "partial-birth abortion."
What about moonbat, or is that covered under irritable bowel syndrome?
"It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," Kramer wrote.
If Kramer's reason and understanding does not equip him to resist marriage for homosexuals then neither will it find anything wrong with marrying a pet or that attractive head of lettuce in the back of the crisper.
The killing came amid heightened concerns about vigilante justice in Mexico, where police are seen as inept or corrupt and people say they must take security into their own hands.
The attack in Oaxaca resembled a November incident in Mexico City in which an angry crowd beat and burned alive two plainclothes federal agents and severely injured a third.
These are the Mexican authorities that are supposed to help us watch the border for terrorists. Their own people see them as inept and corrupt, Houston, we have a problem.
And this: President Vicente Fox responded by firing Mexico City's police chief and the head of the Federal Preventative Police, blaming Mexico City's government for tolerating vigilantism. Dozens of people accused of participating in that attack have been arrested.
I'm sure he'll be firing people after a bridge or school or sports arena is blown up by some muslim martyr maniac in this country. Because, if they come in through Mexico we need to hold Mexico liable and we should start with Senor Fox.
Some sanctions, he said, including the prohibition on the sales of spare parts for civilian aircraft, should never have been imposed on Iran in the first place, and that the lifting such a sanction is "no incentive at all."
And he added that [for sovereign states, admission to the World Trade Organization is one of the most undeniable rights.
Asefi stated that by disseminating lies and inaccurate theories, and claiming that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, the United States has deceived the European Union, while Iran's nuclear activities have always been transparent, and that the International Atomic Energy Agency has also acknowledged the civilian nature of Iran's nuclear program.
"Hypocrisy and duplicity constitute the core of U.S. foreign policy, and this has caused a global distrust of the United States. While Ms. Condoleezza Rice speaks of lifting some sanctions, George W. Bush extends economic sanctions on Iran," he noted.
Asefi said that the Islamic Republic of Iran is determined to make use of civilian nuclear technology, and that no type of pressure or threat could force Iran to stop seeking its rights.
But Sirus Nasseri, a senior Iranian negotiator taking part in nuclear talks with the European Union, dismissed the U.S. move, saying "it is too ridiculous to be called an offer," and calling it," a mere gesture."
We've got an even more interesting gesture for you, down with Iran and up US. These guys will have to be dealt with very, very soon.
The inner Cabinet of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon gave "initial authorization" for an attack at a private meeting last month at his Negev Desert ranch, the Sunday Times of London reported today.
Israeli forces have used a mock-up of Iran's Natanz uranium-enrichment plant in the desert to practice destroying it, according to the Times, which cited no sources.
Their tactics include raids by Israel's elite Shaldag commando unit and airstrikes by F-15 jets, using bunker-busting bombs to penetrate underground facilities, the paper says.
The plans have been discussed with American officials who are said to have indicated provisionally that they would not stand in Israel's way if all international efforts to halt Iranian nuclear projects failed, reports the Times.
If this happens, and perhaps it must, the middle east will explode. Are we ready?
“I’m not a medical expert, this is not my field. I'm an expert in public safety," Graham said. "And if this will help reduce the crime rate — I'm all for it."
I suppose it's in the public interest and safety to have a bunch of stoned, unproductive junkies stumbling around all the time. I suppose it is in the national interest of Canada to say, if you choose not to take responsibility for your life and become a productive, functioning member of society don't worry about it. We will force the rest of society to worry about you and we will enable you to continue down your path of destruction.
Here we go folks, the end justifies the means. Don't attack the problem just control the symptoms. No wonder so many of our lefties want to move there.
Recovered addict Chuck Swesey - who's been clean 20 years - says the program smacks of government drug pushing. He says he knows how he would've ended under a program like this: "I'd be dead ... or I'd be in a jail or an institution."
Listen to this man, the recovered voice of reason. This is government drug pushing and by using taxpayers money it forces people morally opposed to participate. Oh wait, we do that here with abortion.
"The article . . . is, in the opinion of our legal counsel, plagiarism," Dalhousie spokesman Charles Crosby said in summarizing the report's findings.
Churchill did not return calls to his home or office Thursday seeking comment.
Dalhousie began an investigation after professor Fay G. Cohen complained that Churchill used her research and writing in an essay without her permission and without giving her credit. Although the investigation substantiated her allegations, Cohen didn't pursue the matter because she felt threatened by Churchill, Crosby said.
Crosby said Cohen told Dalhousie officials in 1997 that Churchill had called her in the middle of the night and said, "I'll get you for this."
Cohen still declines to talk publicly about her experience with Churchill, but she agreed the Dalhousie report could be shared with CU officials, Crosby said, because "whatever concerns she may have about her safety are outweighed by the importance she attaches to this information getting out there."
Crosby declined a request for a copy of the report but said it does not contain information about the alleged threat from Churchill.
It is not clear if CU officials are aware of the alleged threat. A CU spokeswoman said officials there would not comment on any matter related to an ongoing review of Churchill's work.
A three-person panel is reviewing that to determine if he meets the standards of professional integrity set by CU.
The CU Board of Regents ordered the review after the public outcry over an essay Churchill wrote comparing victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to notorious Nazi bureaucrat Adolf Eichmann. Since then, Churchill has come under fire for some of his other writings and speeches, his scholarship, his claim of American Indian ancestry, and even his artwork.
The review panel, led by Interim Chancellor Phil DiStefano, originally was expected to issue its report this week but said it likely won't be released before Monday and perhaps later.
In 1991, Churchill edited a book of essays published in Copenhagen, Denmark, which included a piece by Cohen on Indian treaty fishing rights in the Northwest and Wisconsin. When publishers wanted to reprint the essay in the United States, Cohen declined to allow her essay to appear, Crosby said.
So, Churchill penned an essay on the same topic under the name of the Institute for Natural Progress, a research organization he founded with Winona LaDuke. In the contributors section of the book, Churchill said he took the lead role in preparing the essay.
Beaver, there's something wrong with the Ward!
Heinz Kerry gave no examples. Last year, a few prelates said they would not allow the Democratic nominee to receive communion in their dioceses. The bishop of Colorado Springs declared that Catholics voting for pro-choice candidates were not welcome at the communion rail.
"The church has a right and obligation to teach values," Heinz Kerry declared. "They don't have a right to restrict freedom of expression, which they did."
Obedience is a virtue. You cannot pick and choose which tenets of a religion you will follow. The hierarchy of the Catholic Church is well defined and the last time I looked Catholics in good standing were subordinate to it.
The unmitigated gall of this woman to condemn the leaders of Catholicism for standing firm in the beliefs of the church.
And so the self ordained sages continue, professing their faith not in God, but in themselves, and wondering why those of us who stand on the Word reject them.
"I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent."
