You didn't see it in the headlines this week, but it's likely to be more important in the long run than many things that received much more notice. The "it" in question is the New Framework for the U.S.-India Defense Relationship signed Monday by U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Indian Defense Minister Pranab Mukherjee.
This agreement provides for increased cooperation on research and development of high-tech weaponry and joint and combined training exercises.
Put it in historic perspective. From the 1950s to 1991, India was a de facto ally of the Soviet Union. It purchased Soviet military equipment, routinely opposed the United States in international forums and shared with the Soviets the purpose of cabining in China. The Soviets for their part took India's side against Pakistan, which in turn was supported by China and the United States. Remember that Henry Kissinger took off on his first secret flight to China from Pakistan.
The Indian-Soviet alliance came to a screeching halt with the end of the Soviet Union in December 1991. The Russians had little to offer India, and India needed new friends. Over the intervening years it became apparent that they had more interests in common with the United States than Jawaharlal Nehru or Indira Gandhi ever thought. As president, Bill Clinton played a constructive role by visiting India and increasing U.S.-India ties. George W. Bush carried on when, in his first months as president, he made a point of stopping by for an unscheduled 45-minute chat with India's foreign minister when he was meeting with Condoleezza Rice.
I have often wondered whether Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf's decision soon after September 11 to cooperate with the United States was prompted by our improving relations with India. Bush administration officials have told me they don't think so. But it seems to me that Musharraf may have thought that if Pakistan didn't cooperate with the United States in its efforts against Afghanistan, India would have, with negative consequences for his regime.
From the Jewish World Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment