Monday, June 27, 2005

Ward Dunghill

Ward Churchill is at it again. If he hasn't gone too far this time I don't know what slime hole is left that he has missed.

How sad for us that in the middle of the war that will determine the fate of America and all of Western Civilization, we must entertain the likes of Churchill's vitrol. Does this moron think his Muslim maniac friends would grant him anything close to the freedom of speech he uses to denigrate his own nation? Yet, who is worse? Are not the words of Durbin more dangerous and treasonous since he speaks for the government? God save the republic from villains such as these.

University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill suggested to a forum on conscientious objection they might be more effective in opposing war if they supported the "fragging" or killing of line officers.

In a Portland meeting on resistance to military recruiting, Churchill, famous for comparing Sept. 11, 2001, victims in the World Trade Center to "little Eichmanns," twice suggested anti-war activists should support those who kill their officers. "For those of you who do, as a matter of principle, oppose war in any form, the idea of supporting a conscientious objector who's already been inducted [and] in his combat service in Iraq might have a certain appeal," he said. "But let me ask you this: Would you render the same support to someone who hadn't conscientiously objected, but rather instead rolled a grenade under their line officer in order to neutralize the combat capacity of their unit?"

Later, in a question-and-answer period, Churchill was asked whether the trauma "fragging" inflicts on that officer's family back home should be considered, he responded: "How do you feel about Adolf Eichmann's family?"

From WorldNetDaily.

No comments: